To build the future, we must escape the present, or, “The bullet hole misconception”On December 6, 2017 by Ilene
Air force pilots in WWII got shot like crazy and suffered farcical levels of fatalities; in an effort to save airmen, the Allies used statistical analysis to determine where the planes that limped home had taken flak and armored up those sections — which totally failed to work. That’s because the planes that made it home had suffered non-critical damage, so shoring up the sections where they’d been hit had virtually no effect on the rate at which flak to critical sections of the aircraft caused it to be shot out of the sky. In other words, by looking at survivors rather than the dead, they were protecting the least important parts of the planes.
In a transcript of a speech given at Voxxed Days Belgrad, Daniel G Siegel describes how this “bullet hole misconception” traps technology designers — their survivor bias causes them to solve the problems that are sufficiently unserious that they can survive until someone can notice them. It’s like a customer service department that only hears from the people whose experience is sufficiently bearable that they buy their purchases and then complain — but they don’t hear anything from the vastly larger numbers who never make it to the cash register because of some process failure.
This is particularly exacerbated by the professionalization and financialization of the tech sector. When there was no defined pipeline into computing, people came from lots of different disciplines; when the cash rewards for tech sector success were modest, people came because of their passion, not their dreams of riches. The homogenization of tech to people with engineering degrees who want to get really rich puts the focus on a very narrow class of production and innovation techniques.
What’s really fascinating here, is that one of the reasons why the early days of computing were so interesting was that nobody back then was a computer scientist.
Everybody who came into computing back then came with a different background, interest and knowledge of other domains. They didn’t know anything about the computer and therefore tried everything they could think of while figuring out how they could leverage it to solve their problems.
So what are talking about here? Well, it is not about optimization, not about disruption, not about just the next thing and not about adding armor to the wrong places on bombers. It is about rotating the point of view.
When I meet people who work at the world’s leading tech companies, I ask them about why they don’t look at the long term consequences of what they do on society? And I ask why they don’t allow radical new ideas that augment human capabilities? Or why their so-called innovation and disruption is merely recycled, old stuff in new clothing? They answer that these problems are hard to solve. But let’s be honest, the Googles and Facebooks and Twitters and virtually every tech company in the world solve similarly difficult technical problems every single day.
I want to suggest that this is not entirely a technological proclamation. Rather, it’s a proclamation about profits and politics.
the bullet hole misconception [Daniel G Siegel]
(via 4 Short Links)
Tim O’Reilly has his finger on the pulse of technology and the people who make it in a way that is unmatched by anyone in the world; the publisher of the world’s best-loved computer books, the host of technology’s best-loved conferences, the convenor of the most important conversations about tech and its people, O’Reilly is literally uniquely situated to understand the arc, trajectory, and possible destinations of technology and its impact on real people, which is what separates his breakout business book, WTF?: What’s the Future and Why It’s Up to Us, from rest of the field.
We just bought a house here in Burbank and I was delighted to learn that my new home office — part of a business incorporated in the state of California — would be sitting directly on one of the scorching-fast fiber optic lines that the city of Burbank maintains to wire up Disney, Warners and […]
“Still Not Dotcom” is Brian McMullen’s annual catalog of unregistered .com domains — as found poetry goes, you’d be hard pressed to find anything funnier. You can also listen to it as a free, unabridged audiobook thanks to KCRW’s The Organist.
uTalk is an educational app designed to get you speaking in a new tongue as soon as possible, and the subscription in the Boing Boing Store has been reduced to $19.99. With uTalk, you can choose from a huge list of over 130 languages — you aren’t stuck with just the most popular selections from […]
For those who have never piloted a quadcopter, but don’t want to burn their cash on cheap plastic, the TRNDlabs Spectre offers a high-end feel with a gentle learning curve. It’s being offered in the Boing Boing Store now for $92.99. To help you quickly get the hang of flying, this drone features a beginner […]
Mastery of Adobe apps is encouraged, if not outright required for entry into creative industry roles. To take your skills beyond rudimentary Photoshop, we’re offering the Adobe CC Lifetime Mastery Bundle in the Boing Boing Store for a pay-what-you-want price. This collection includes 9 comprehensive sections covering the essential parts of Adobe’s Creative Cloud. Building […]